Welcome to our blog.

The minute I placed my order for the Orb DF-01iA+ Record Flattener I knew exactly which album I had in mind to test it out with: Matao with Atilla Engin ‎– Turkish Delight. This was a nice priced reissue by Arsivplak of the rare and rather expensive 1979 original slab of Danish Jazz-Rock/Fusion with Turkish elements.

I received the record with a pretty nasty edge warp that made me very wary of playing it and risking damage to my stylus on the large slalom that was the first track. I wrote it off at the time and put it away to experiment on down the road with the Vinyl Flat I had purchased a few years back. I had flattened a few records with the Vinyl Flat for a customer as a test case, with mixed results. They were heavily warped and he figured he had nothing to lose testing it out. This sent me down a rabbit hole of researching the larger commercial units.

Once I pulled the trigger on the Orb, this seemed like the perfect test case: a large edge warp on heavy modern vinyl. So many contemporary records are being churned out at the factory as fast as possible to accommodate the huge demand on the very few pressing plants currently in operation, often running 24 hours a day. This leads to a number of warped records that haven’t had sufficient time to cool properly. I’ve received a number of inquires as to whether I can flatten records, often describing this exact scenario.

The Orb proved super simple to use and after four hours I had an almost perfectly flat record that I felt no trepidation about throwing on my turntable. You can see the before and after for yourself:



The one downside? That’s a hell of a catchy opening track that is now permanently burned into my brain from how often I’ve heard it putting this video together 😉 This was an easy case that came through with no distortion as the grooves thankfully were not damaged.

Interested in getting your own records flattened? Unlike cleaning, there is inherent risk in heating up the vinyl to bend it back into shape, so I have some caveats for you. For a full rundown of both the risks and rewards of my Record Flattening Service please visit this page to read more.

I am incredibly excited to announce the availability of cleaning services using my custom built Ultrasonic cleaning system! I have been testing this new system on my own records throughout the summer and have been extremely impressed with the results. 

Ultrasonic cleaning has long been thought to be the single most effective way to clean records. It is what inspired me to create this site and offer my services to vinyl collectors and enthusiasts curious to see what it can do for their records. My obsessive desire to get records as clean as possible has lead me to continue my research after first purchasing an Audio Desk Systeme, arguably the best commercially available cleaning unit on the market. 

The Audio Desk provided great results, but was also a piece of equipment that I was often frustrated with. In the Pro column, it quickly cleaned and dried a record, allowing you go from opening the sleeve to turntable in under 15 minutes with a squeaky clean record. The Con colum soon started to add up for me: multiple moving parts that required frequent replacement and adjustment (micro fiber barrels, squeegee wipers, foam sponge, cleaning fluid); only being able to clean a single record at a time; the fan pushing water droplets onto the label…

This ‘on demand’ cleaning is what makes the Audio Desk popular with most collectors who want the instant gratification of cleaning a record to then immediately play. Unfortunately for me, I am not your average collector. My obsession with vinyl has albums constantly arriving to my home needing a thorough cleaning. This is before even considering all the records that clients send in to be cleaned. I’ve long wanted a way to streamline the ultrasonic process and clean multiple records at once. 

I had been coming across a number of different multi-record cleaning options such as the Vinyl Stack which allowed for cleaning three-four at once. You had to purchase your own tank, which added to the daunting amount of research. Other DIY-looking units seen in YouTube videos and on forums came across as half-baked Rube Goldberg machines that I didn’t feel confident in. It was around this time that I began reading The Vinyl Press and began a correspondence with Bill about cleaning, other record related concerns, and more important matters such as the best Italian restaurant in Brooklyn Heights. Like me, Bill is fastidious about cleaning and began hosting one of the best single resources dedicated to record cleaning on his site, featuring guest posts of experts on top of his own anecdotal research. I eagerly suggest you check it out if you’re not already bored of my ramblings here.

It was here I came across Tima’s DIY RCM, which I later used as the template for my own system. I spent the next year and a half following Tima’s updates and posts, and began to slowly ponder building a version of this machine for myself, stashing away the funds for the new components. I finally took the plunge this past June, sourced all the material, and I was up and running by early August. I’ve spent the subsequent two months experimenting and fine-tuning performance, listening to A/B tests of every possible cleaning permutation to see if this setup was actually delivering the results that many others had seen. I was able to clean a hundred records in the first weekend of action – it definitely passed the test when it came to quantity. So how was the quality? 

Without being too hyperbolic or putting on the hard sell, the results blew me away. I concentrated on records that I had recently cleaned using my normal process of vacuum cleaning followed by a session in the Audio Desk. As many of these are part of the collection I have been selling, I had been taking notes when play grading and had the perfect ‘before’ records to work with. Most records that went for a second cleaning in the new DIY system saw a distinct improvement in playback with decreased areas of surface noise in places I had previously noted it. 

My anecdotal experience showed me across the board improvements, both in the experience of cleaning a large number of records and in how clean they were. So what is the science behind these results? I wanted to make sure I wasn’t hearing a placebo effect (I try not to dabble in the darkest reaches of audiophilia, so I won’t confirm or deny if I heard not only a lower noise floor, but better bass response like many claim). This DIY system is based on years of Audiophile tweaks and R&D as popularized on the Audio Nirvana forum that was the genesis of Tima’s wonderful step-by-step guide. These guys have done a far better job of describing the scientific principles–both practical and specific–behind ultrasonic record cleaning than I ever could. 

For me, an important technical improvement in this system is the additional time the records can spend in the bath. Both the Audio Desk and KL-Audio units only allowed for a maximum of 5 minute contact with fluid in their cleaning cycles. The records spin fairly quickly, and don’t seem to have significant enough time under water to reap the full benefits of cavitation. The Kuzma rotisserie has variable power settings to alter the speed at which the records rotate, and I have been able to experiment with both the speed and the length of the bath, settling on one RPM of the record within a 20 minute bath. The sweep and pulse functions that vary cavitation allow for cleaning both the surface of the record, and deep into the grooves. Heating the water to a warm-but-not-hot 30 degrees C (86 degrees F) brings it to the optimal temperature for cavitation, while still being completely safe to the vinyl. 

What I have come to find is the most important difference between the commercial cleaners and this system is the filtration of the water. I was unaware of just how quickly the water in the Audio Desk would need changing because of the dissolved particles that are a byproduct of cavitation cleaning debris out of the grooves, and how poor it’s ‘filter’ sponge was at removing them. After a while I would be cleaning with ‘dirty’ water, with no way to quantify if this was returning contaminants to the records before they were removed from the machine. 

In this new system the water is continuously pumped through a 0.35 micron filter to prevent the dissolved contaminants from returning to the records before they are removed from the tank. I also took the advice of getting a TDS Meter to measure the total dissolved solids. But I haven’t bought the lab coat. Yet. Now I know exactly when to change out the water in the ultrasonic tank for maximum performance (I also began doing this with the water in Audio Desk months ago). 

I use a diluted cleaning solution of 99.9% pure isopropyl alcohol and Ilfotol wetting agent for the surfactant; this is solely to allow the water and the bubbles produced during cavitation to get as deep into the grooves as possible, while still remaining neutral to the vinyl itself. The heavy duty scrubbing and enzymatic bath still takes place during the vacuum cleaning stage. This solution evaporates quickly, and because of the filtration, there are no dissolved particles left behind on the vinyl. 

When the cycle is done, the records are removed from the bath, and the spindle is set at a 45 degree angle to air dry. I use a small 4” fan to circulate air around them to help them dry. A small amount of airborne particles will inevitably end up on the records as they dry, but these simply wipe off with a carbon fiber brush and never get past the surface. 

Not only has this new cleaning method improved the quality and quantity of cleaning I can do, it also allows me more time to listen to records. The 20 minute bath is conveniently similar to the average length of the album side I can listen to between baths. I will now be offering this as the sole method of ultrasonic cleaning service I provide. If you’re somehow still reading, I hope I can help clean your records to this outstanding standard in the future. 

I would like to again express my sincere thanks to Tima, Bill, and everyone else who has contributed to the collective online wisdom in the vinyl community that helped develop this DIY RCM. 

  • Mike

This is the first in a series of profiles on records I have received for cleaning and the results.

I’ve known Jeff of PopShop Record Stop on music message boards for years and always known him to be a discerning listener. He had expressed interest in ultrasonic cleaning during one discussion and was one of the first people I offered a trial once I had the Audio Desk Ultrasonic machine. It just so happens that he had recently won an auction for a rare record that was in serious need of help:

“One album I just got is the 1974 RCA WLP of Adriano Monteduro & Reale Accademia Di Musica. The seller overgraded so bad it’s scary. I got it out of Japan and the guy called it M- (A+) when it’s more like G (D+). Just awful. Mold on it and lots of dirt and grime. The record as it is now plays super noisy but there don’t appear to be many scratches, so it’s possible it could be saved. As it happens, this is one of my favorite albums of all time, so I am really disappointed. When you see this LP, the idea that it was graded A+ (M-) will give you a laugh.”

Jeff sent me a needledrop of the record before sending it to me to hear how playback sounded.


Anyone who has bought records online has likely been in this same situation. This was exactly the kind of record I knew would benefit from a combination of Enzymatic VPI and Ultrasonic cleaning. I took some photos* of the record before I first cleaned it:

AMRADM_side_A_beforeA side before

AMRADM_side_B_beforeB side before

VPI Cleaning

As you can see there in addition to a heavy amount of dust there is significant mold on each side of the record. This level of grime required two cleaning passes on the VPI, first with Disc Doctor solution, then Audio Intelligent Enzymatic:

AMRADM_side_A_VPI A side after VPI cleaning

AMRADM_side_B_VPIB side after VPI cleaning

Ultrasonic cleaning:

From the above shots after VPI cleaning you can see all the mold is gone and the record is much improved in gloss. With this degree of mold and grime an ultrasonic cleaning was imperative to remove the remainder of what might still be in the grooves:

A side after Ultrasonic cleaning

B side after Ultrasonic cleaning

Ultrasonic cleaning in the Audio Desk machine removed the last traces of grime and brought out the full gloss of the record even further, as you can see from the rainbow sheen.

Full before and after comparisons:

AMRADM_side_A_before_after AMRADM_side_B_before_after AMRADM_side_B_before_after_2

So it looks great, but how does it sound now that it has been fully cleaned?

“Man of man oh MAN! RADM sounds INCREDIBLE! I cannot believe how well you saved that album!”

Here is the needledrop of the cleaned record (absolutely no click removal or noise reduction of any kind was used):


Progressive rock, especially from Italy, was huge in Japan in the 80s and 90s. Many of the records were still new when imported, and Japanese collectors are generally well thought of when it comes to the care and handling of records. One thing not in their favor is that Japan does not have the best climate for storing things in cardboard; it is quite humid, especially in the spring and summer. I often see a lot of foxing and other humidity related issues on items from Japan, so I wasn’t too surprised to see the mold on this record. Luckily there was little physical damage to the record aside from a few hairlines and all that was required to bring out the full sonic potential of the record was a full VPI and Ultrasonic cleaning.

Many thanks to Jeff for letting me feature one of his prized records here.


*A quick note on the photos – they are intentionally overexposed to show the full details of the record under strong light.